
emily
Regular
Dec 10, 2002, 10:27 AM
Post #1 of 10
(4376 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Short arms and "catching" poses
|
Can't Post
|
|
Hello, I have a general question on whether arm length might impede someone's ability to perform the full versions of poses like malasana, pasasana, or matsyendrasana. For me, poses in which you "catch" your arms behind your back have always been challenging. I understand about modifying them using a belt and have had some success with that. My arms, shoulders, and back are very flexible, so I don't know where I'm stuck. I was looking at some pictures of Mr. Iyengar and Geeta performing these poses and also standing in tadasana. With all due respect, I was struck by how long their arms appear to be in relation to the rest of their frame. Could shorter arms, such as mine(!), be a factor in an inability to do these poses? I am just curious to learn what anyone else thinks about this idea, either if you can confirm it, or if you think the idea is just silly (or somewhere in between!). On a practical level, I want to guage how much hope I have for achieving the final poses. In other words, if do I have a physiological limitation to performing them fully, I might concentrate on developing in the "intermediate" stages. Does anyone know if arm length could be a factor in these "catching" poses? many thanks! emily
|